Det danske Fredsakademi
Kronologi over fredssagen og international politik 12. maj 2014 / Time Line May 12, 2014
Version 3.005/12/2014
Iran 1953: The Strange Odyssey of Kermit Roosevelt's "Countercoup"
CIA Approved Ex-Agent's Memoir of "28 Mordad" Coup After Changes Rendered It "Essentially a Work of Fiction"
1979 Publication Delayed by Legal Threats from British Petroleum, Iran Hostage Crisis
Shah and CIA Director George Bush Okayed Memoir Idea
National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 468. Edited by Malcolm Byrne
Washington, DC, May 12, 2014 -- As the Iranian revolution crested in 1978-1979, the CIA approved a memoir by Kermit
Roosevelt, one of the architects of the 1953 coup against Iran's nationalist prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddeq. After first
balking at the potential exposure of numerous "secrets," the CIA relented when Roosevelt agreed to delete all mention of MI6 and
made over 150 other changes that rendered the book "essentially a work of fiction," according to recently declassified CIA files
posted today by the National Security Archive.
The internal CIA deliberations over Roosevelt's "Countercoup: The Struggle for the Control of Iran" (McGraw-Hill, 1979 [sic])
were released through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and provided to the National Security Archive on an anonymous
basis by the original requester. They are posted here for the first time.
Missing from the documents is what happened when British Petroleum discovered that "Countercoup" (falsely) identified its
predecessor, the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), as the instigator of the operation. In fact, MI6 originated the plan. The oil
concern threatened to file suit, which prompted publisher McGraw-Hill to pull virtually the entire print run of 7,500 copies in
1979. 400 copies had already made it out to reviewers and bookstores, but most of those were returned.
In a final twist, the revised version of the book hit the streets in August 1980 (retaining the 1979 date on the copyright page), but
with the reinsertion of numerous references to "British intelligence" as the key player on the British side (replacing "AIOC"), even
though disguising MI6's role had been one of the principal reasons for censoring the volume in the first place. No official
explanation has ever surfaced for this decision, which has directly undermined continuing claims by both U.S. and British
intelligence that any acknowledgement of London's part in planning the coup would present a grave threat to the national security.
 |
 |