Det danske Fredsakademi

Kronologi over fredssagen og international politik 18. August 2004 / Timeline August 18, 2004

Version 3.5

17. August 2004, 19. August 2004


08/18/2004
Army will withhold payment to Halliburton due to suspicious bills
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/news/withhold_payment.html
The U.S. Army has decided to withhold 15 percent of future payments to Halliburton because the company apparently billed taxpayers for work that was never undertaken or completed, Reuters reports. Halliburton had said yesterday that the Army would give it more time to explain the suspicious bills, but today's news indicates that was not the case. The company told Reuters that its claim yesterday that Army officials had given it more time to explain the suspicious bills "were accurate at the time based on clear oral assurances from senior Pentagon representatives."
The Pentagon last week told Halliburton's KBR subsidiary that $1.8 billion in bills from the company's work in the the Middle East are not verifiable. The $1.8 billion represents 43 percent of Halliburton's total bills submitted to the Pentagon for reimbursement. The company was given until Aug. 15 to justify those bills, but failed to meet that deadline. It also failed to meet two previous deadlines that had been extended, Reuters reported.
If Halliburton fails to justify its expenses, the Pentagon can withhold up to 15 percent of requested reimbursements. The Army estimated that KBR work orders with a future value of $8.2 billion could be affected by a 15 percent withholding, or $60 million per month. So far, Halliburton has received $4.3 billion from the Pentagon for its work under the Army's LOGCAP contract. Under LOGCAP, Halliburton's KBR subsidiary is charged with feeding the troops, transporting military supplies and personnel, and constructing military housing -- mostly in Iraq and Kuwait.
The withholding of payments will affect future, not past, invoices submitted by Halliburton.
"At the end of the day, we do not expect this will have a significant or sustained impact on liquidity," said Cris Gaut, chief financial officer, in a news release. "There are very few companies in the world that could or would adapt this quickly while, at the same time, financing an operation of this magnitude."
Halliburton will take legal action against the Pentagon over the dispute. The company wants a judge to rule that the 15 percent withholding does not apply to its LOGCAP and Restore Iraqi Oil I and II contracts with the Army, which constitute the bulk of its work in the Middle East.
More Information:
HalliburtonWatch: Pentagon says 43% of Halliburton's Iraq expenses are not verifiable
HalliburtonWatch: Halliburton overcharged for meals by $186 million
HalliburtonWatch: Two reports explain how Halliburton took taxpayers for a ride in Iraq
HalliburtonWatch: Gasoline Overcharges
HalliburtonWatch: Government widens criminal probe of Halliburton's gas overcharges

08/18/2004
Thule Radar Work Set for 2005, to Cost $260 Million
The early warning radar system at Thule Air Base in Greenland is expected to undergo $260 million in upgrades over three years, beginning in 2005, Inside Missile Defense reported today.
The improved system would give the planned U.S. missile defense system a better tracking ability by enabling the radar, 750 miles north of the Arctic Circle, to follow missiles launched from the Middle East, according to Inside Missile Defense.
Upgrades would be similar to work done on early warning radar systems at Beale Air Force Base in California and to a project under way at Fylingdales Air Base in the United Kingdom (see GSN, Feb. 6, 2003). Those efforts involved enhancing "computer processing capabilities, graphic displays and communication integration" with system command and battle management computers, according to the U.S. Missile Defense Agency.
The agency plans to spend $15 million for Thule radar work in fiscal 2005, $142.1 million in fiscal 2006 and $102.7 million in fiscal 2007 (Thomas Duffy, Inside Missile Defense.

08/18/2004

Top


Gå til Fredsakademiets forside
Tilbage til indholdsfortegnelsen for september 2004

Send kommentar, email eller søg i Fredsakademiet.dk
Locations of visitors to this page